Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Veronika Bond's avatar

Such a complex topic, which you've handled with competence and grace. Despite the fact that I instantly struggled with the Jungian archetypal roles in the opening paragraphs (my mother wasn't 'the nurturing role model who made me feel welcome and safe', and my father refused to handle money and left the financial management of our family household to my mother, even though he earned all the money!) I kept reading and learned so much!

I really appreciate the distinction you're making between shame and guilt. And the 'relationship with money at the hormonal level' is a new (to me) thought well worth pursuing.

Thank you so much, Katerina, for a fascinating article about a subject that affects all of us deeply 💕🙏

Expand full comment
Beach Hippie's avatar

Money is only seriously used in authoritarian dominator societies. It's not neutral, it's not existential any more than a game of monopoly is existential; it's created by egotisical psychopaths who wish to control the behavior of others for their own selfish reasons.

Consider what the effect of money and how it gains value. It has value only because it's always kept in short supply for the masses. It guarantees a servant class out of the desperation that money itself creates. Rulers love it. That's why they all use it, if it didn't directly serve to maintain or expand their power they'd never maintain its use.

Money also creates a society based in lies, since people routinely take up activities they'd ordinarily never do unless the fear of scarcity or desire for control and status was driving their actions.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts